The Oscar-winning actress Explains Why She Declined an On-Set Intimacy Professional on Latest Project Her Upcoming Movie
Jennifer Lawrence has joined the increasing number of actors who voice skepticism about the necessity of intimacy coordinators, revealing she chose not to use their services while working on her latest project her upcoming film.
Understanding the Role of On-Set Intimacy Professionals
Intimacy coordinators emerged following the #MeToo movement to guarantee the security and comfort of actors during scenes involving nudity and intimate moments. Yet, numerous prominent actors including Gwyneth Paltrow and Sean Bean have voiced concerns about their presence, with several suggesting they disrupt creative flow.
Lawrence's Personal Experience
In conversation on the popular culture podcast, while promoting her latest project where she portrays a woman descending into mental health challenges, Lawrence commented: "We chose not to use an intimacy coordinator, or maybe we had the option but didn't make use of their services... I felt completely safe with Robert."
She continued: "He is completely professional and very committed to his partner. Our conversations primarily focused on our children and relationships. There was absolutely no uncomfortable moments or questions about personal boundaries."
"Had there been even a hint of discomfort, I definitely would have insisted on an intimacy coordinator. Many male actors take offense if you don't reciprocate their attention, and subsequently the retaliation starts. He was completely different."
Industry Recognition and Continuing Discussion
Earlier this week, industry platform IMDb formally acknowledged intimacy coordinators as a separate category, together with eleven other professional roles including choreography, catering, and puppet operation. Before this, they were grouped under "additional crew" instead of having their specific credit.
Despite this recognition, intimacy coordinators still encounter media scrutiny implying they might not be required standards, with high-profile actors declining their involvement. Lawrence's perspective mirrors that of another prominent actress, who previously revealed she refused professional supervision while filming alongside her co-star on The Morning Show.
Jennifer's Perspective
"Jon was such a gentleman – truly each action, every cut, 'Are you OK?" she remembered. "The scenes were additionally carefully planned. That's the benefit of working with skilled editors, suitable lighting. So, you don't prepare."
She added, "They offered, 'Having someone check if you're comfortable,' and I responded, 'Honestly, this is awkward enough!' We're seasoned actors – we can manage appropriately. And we had Mimi on set."
Additional Cases and Professional Response
Despite featuring multiple sequences of intimate moments and regular undress, the award-winning film – the director's acclaimed project about a sex worker and a wealthy heir – proceeded without an on-set professional.
Mikey Madison stated she and co-star Mark Eydelshteyn "decided it would be preferable to keep it small."
"My character is a professional in adult entertainment, and I had researched the director's work and understood his dedication to realism. I was professionally ready for it. As an actress, I treated it as professional work."
These statements provoked strong reactions from intimacy coordinators, mirroring the response to Gwyneth Paltrow's recent comments, who earlier this year shared that working on her new movie her latest film represented her first encounter with the relatively new profession, which she "was unaware of previously."
Paltrow's Perspective
When asked about personal ease with a specific move alongside co-star Timothée Chalamet, the actress responded: "I'm from the generation where you get naked, you assume position, the camera's on."
She continued that she and Chalamet then informed the professional: "We believe we're comfortable. You can maintain distance.' I can't speak to how it is for newer performers, but... if someone is directing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an creative professional, very stifled by that."
Professional Reaction
Following these comments, industry executive an experienced producer described them as "irresponsible" and highlighted that most of those opposing these professionals have established careers to maintain personal authority and protection on film sets.
"Occasionally an performer makes comments about whether they value on-set professionals or not," said Hollick. "Gwyneth Paltrow mentioned she came of age in a time when industry professionals 'took our kit off and got on with it'. As a powerful woman in Hollywood working with a actor much younger than her, although likely he is comfortable, I found it somewhat concerning remark."
Male Perspective
Michael Douglas, meanwhile, expressed that he feels the main obligation during intimate sequences falls on the male actor, rather than a third party.
"Based on my career, you take responsibility as the male actor to make certain the female co-star is comfortable, you talk through thoroughly," he said. "You state, '{OK, I'm going to touch you here if that's acceptable'. It's very deliberate but seems like it's occurring organically, which is hopefully what authentic performance appears as."